Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

A comparison of ceramic crown color difference between different shade selection methods: Visual, digital camera, and smartphone

      Abstract

      Statement of problem

      The light source stability of digital cameras and smartphones is important in shade matching in restorative and prosthetic dentistry to communicate objectively with the dental laboratory. Techniques that standardize the light source of such devices are lacking, and this limitation can lead to color mismatches, difficulties in color communication, and treatment documentation.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the magnitude of color difference (ΔE) among 3 shade selection methods during the fabrication of ceramic crowns: visual shade selection with a shade guide, digital shade selection with a digital camera and cross-polarizing filter, and digital shade selection with a smartphone and a light-correcting device.

      Material and methods

      Forty-five patients in need of ceramic crowns were enrolled, and shade selection was evaluated according to different protocols: visual shade selection (A-D shade guide and IPS Natural Die Material Shade Guide, sent to the dental laboratory technician via a laboratory prescription); digital shade selection with a digital camera (D7000; Nikon Corp) with an 85-mm lens and wireless close-up flash, with and without a cross-polarizing filter (Polar eyes); and digital shade selection with a smartphone and a light-correcting device (iPhone XS attached to Smile Lite MDP, with and without its cross-polarizing filter accessory). Information from the smartphone was imported to an app (IPS e.max Shade Navigation App; Ivoclar AG) that converted the reading to a shade and level of translucency for the ceramic restoration. For all photographs, a gray reference card with known color values was positioned by the mandibular teeth and was used for white balancing of the digital photographs with a software program. All photographs were edited and sent to the dental laboratory: white-balanced with the shade guide; white-balanced with the substrate shade guide; black and white; saturated; and cross-polarized. Ceramic crowns were made with the same lithium disilicate material (IPS e.max CAD; Ivoclar AG) and cemented with the same resin cement (RelyX Ultimate Clicker, A3 shade; 3M). The ΔE values between the crown and the adjacent tooth were determined. The data were analyzed by using a 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc tests (α=.05).

      Results

      The mean ΔE between a cemented ceramic crown and the adjacent tooth in the visual shade selection group was 5.32, significantly different than both digital camera (ΔE=2.75; P=.002) and smartphone (ΔE=2.34; P=.001), which were not different from each other (P=.857).

      Conclusions

      The digital shade selection with photographs acquired with both a digital camera and a smartphone with a light-correcting device showed a threshold within the acceptable values (ΔE<3.7), whereas the visual shade selection showed an average ΔE above the threshold for acceptable values (ΔE>3.7). The use of a gray reference card helped standardize the white balance from the digital images.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gasparik C.
        • Grecu A.G.
        • Culic B.
        • Badea M.E.
        • Dudea D.
        Shadematching performance using a new lightcorrecting device.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015; 27: 285-292
        • Kalman L.
        Development of a novel dental shade determination application.
        J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2020; 14: 73-76
        • Karamouzos A.
        • Papadopoulos M.A.
        • Kolokithas G.
        • Athanasiou A.E.
        Precision of in vivo spectrophotometric colour evaluation of natural teeth.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34: 613-621
        • Van der Burgt T.P.
        • ten Bosch J.J.
        • Borsboom P.C.
        • Kortsmit W.J.
        A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63: 155-162
        • Gómez-Polo C.
        • Gómez-Polo M.
        • Celemin-Viñuela A.
        • Martínez Vázquez De Parga J.A.
        Differences between the human eye and the spectrophotometer in the shade matching of tooth colour.
        J Dent. 2014; 42: 742-745
        • Pecho O.E.
        • Ghinea R.
        • Perez M.M.
        • Della Bona A.
        Influence of gender on visual shade matching in dentistry.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017; 29: E15-E23
        • Clary J.A.
        • Ontiveros J.C.
        • Cron S.G.
        • Paravina R.D.
        Influence of light source, polarization, education, and training on shade matching quality.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 91-97
        • Tam W.K.
        • Lee H.J.
        Dental shade matching using a digital camera.
        J Dent. 2012; 40: E3-E10
        • Miyajiwala J.S.
        • Kheur M.G.
        • Patankar A.H.
        • Lakha T.A.
        Comparison of photographic and conventional methods for tooth shade selection: A clinical evaluation.
        J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017; 17: 273-281
        • Jarad F.
        • Russell M.
        • Moss B.
        The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry.
        Br Dent J. 2005; 199: 43-49
        • Bahannan S.A.
        Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods.
        J Dent. 2014; 42: 48-52
        • Chang J.Y.
        • Chen W.C.
        • Huang T.K.
        • Wang J.C.
        • Fu P.S.
        • Chen J.H.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the accuracy and limitations of three tooth-color measuring machines.
        J Dent Sci. 2015; 10: 16-20
        • Liberato W.F.
        • Barreto I.C.
        • Costa P.P.
        • de Almeida C.C.
        • Pimentel W.
        • Tiossi R.
        A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121: 271-275
        • Gurrea J.
        • Gurrea M.
        • Bruguera A.
        • Sampaio C.S.
        • Janal M.
        • Bonfante E.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of dental shade guide variability using cross-polarized photography.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016; 36: E76-E81
        • Sampaio C.S.
        • Gurrea J.
        • Gurrea M.
        • Bruguera A.
        • Atria P.J.
        • Janal M.
        • et al.
        Dental shade guide variability for hues B, C, and D using cross-polarized photography.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018; 38: S113-S118
        • Hein S.
        • Zangl M.
        The use of a standardized gray reference card in dental photography to correct the effects of five commonly used diffusers on the color of 40 extracted human teeth.
        Int J Esthet Dent. 2016; 2: 246-259
        • Sampaio C.S.
        • Atria P.J.
        • Hirata R.
        • Jorquera G.
        Variability of color matching with different digital photography techniques and a gray reference card.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121: 333-339
        • Schropp L.
        Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
        J Prosthodont. 2009; 18: 235-241
        • Tam W.K.
        • Lee H.J.
        Accurate shade image matching by using a smartphone camera.
        J Prosthodont Res. 2017; 61: 168-176
        • Johnston W.M.
        • Kao E.C.
        Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry.
        J Dent Res. 1989; 68: 819-822
        • Wee A.G.
        • Lindsey D.T.
        • Kuo S.
        • Johnston W.M.
        Color accuracy of commercial digital cameras for use in dentistry.
        Dent Mater. 2006; 22: 553-559
        • Mahn E.
        • Tortora S.C.
        • Olate B.
        • Cacciuttolo F.
        • Kernitsky J.
        • Jorquera G.
        Comparison of visual analog shade matching, a digital visual method with a cross-polarized light filter, and a spectrophotometer for dental color matching.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2021; 125: 511-516
        • Hernandes D.K.L.
        • Arrais C.A.G.
        • Lima E.
        • Cesar P.F.
        • Rodrigues J.A.
        Influence of resin cement shade on the color and translucency of ceramic veneers.
        J Appl Oral Sci. 2016; 24: 391-396
        • Yamanel K.
        • Caglar A.
        • Özcan M.
        • Gulsah K.
        • Bagis B.
        Assessment of color parameters of composite resin shade guides using digital imaging versus colorimeter.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010; 22: 379-388
        • Smile Line USA
        Smile Lite MDP Full Set.
        (Available at:)