Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Tips from Our Readers| Volume 127, ISSUE 2, P371-372, February 2022

Download started.

Ok

A cost-effective and straightforward technique to fabricate an intraoral photographic contraster

  • Ahmed M. Zaher
    Affiliations
    Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Sciences, The Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Ga
    Search for articles by this author
  • Melissa Hunt
    Affiliations
    Assistant Professor, Department of General Dentistry, The Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Ga
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jimmy Londono
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author: Dr Jimmy Londono, Department of Restorative Sciences, The Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University, 1120 15th Street, GC 1137, Augusta, GA, 30912
    Affiliations
    Associate Professor, Interim Director of the Ronald Goldstein Center for Esthetic and Implant Dentistry, Department of Oral Sciences, The Dental College of Georgia at Augusta Univeristy, Augusta, Ga
    Search for articles by this author
Published:December 02, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.032
      Dental photography is a routine procedure in contemporary dental practice.
      • Goodlin R.
      Photographic-assisted diagnosis and treatment planning.
      A photographic black contraster is a tool for dental photography that provides a black background to isolate the teeth of interest. The black color neutralizes the background, making it easier to visualize color matches or mismatches.
      • McLaren E.A.
      • Chang Y.Y.
      Photography and Photoshop: simple tools and rules for effective and accurate communication.
      Digital photographs aid in transferring information about shade, enamel staining, characterization, and incisal edge translucency between the dentist and the dental laboratory technician.
      • McLaren E.A.
      • Figueira J.
      • Goldstein R.E.
      A technique using calibrated photography and Photoshop for accurate shade analysis and communication.
      High-quality images can impress patients and can be used for professional instruction and publications.
      • Terry D.A.
      • Snow S.R.
      • McLaren E.A.
      Contemporary dental photography: selection and application.
      Rigid contrasters can be made of anodized aluminum or aluminum steel alloy and soft contraster of malleable stainless steel or copper sheet covered with medical grade plastic silicone rubber, which is latex-free, safe, and hypoallergenic. Contrasters are sterilized in an autoclave up to 135 °C and available in different shapes to allow anterior, lateral, and occlusal photographs, as well as of different sizes including large, medium, or small adult arches and for pediatric use.
      Contrasters are available from dental suppliers. However, they are relatively expensive, and usually multiple contrasters are needed for different intraoral photographs. The following article describes a cost-effective and straightforward technique to fabricate an intraoral photographic contraster by using a kitchen solid nylon turner or spatula. A nylon turner is inexpensive, heat-resistant, stain-resistant, safe to use, and autoclavable. In addition, it has a long contra-angled handle for improved convenience and accessibility.

      Procedure

      References

        • Goodlin R.
        Photographic-assisted diagnosis and treatment planning.
        Dent Clin North Am. 2011; 55: 211-227
        • McLaren E.A.
        • Chang Y.Y.
        Photography and Photoshop: simple tools and rules for effective and accurate communication.
        Inside Dentistry. 2006; 2: 97-101
        • McLaren E.A.
        • Figueira J.
        • Goldstein R.E.
        A technique using calibrated photography and Photoshop for accurate shade analysis and communication.
        Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017; 38: 106-113
        • Terry D.A.
        • Snow S.R.
        • McLaren E.A.
        Contemporary dental photography: selection and application.
        Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008; 29: 432-436