Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

An in vitro comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of ultrathin occlusal veneers made of 3D-printed zirconia, milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate

      Abstract

      Statement of problem

      Whether additively produced zirconia could overcome problems with conventional computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CAD-CAM) such as milling inaccuracies and provide accurate occlusal veneers is unclear.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed zirconia occlusal veneers with CAD-CAM–fabricated zirconia or heat-pressed lithium disilicate ceramic (LS2) restorations on molars.

      Material and methods

      The occlusal enamel in 60 extracted human molars was removed, with the preparation extending into dentin. Occlusal veneers at a thickness of 0.5 mm were designed and manufactured according to their group allocation: 3DP, 3D-printed zirconia; CAM, milled zirconia; and HPR, heat-pressed LS2. The prepared teeth and restorations were scanned and superimposed, and the marginal and internal adaptation were measured 2- and 3-dimensionally; the production accuracy (trueness) was also measured. The comparisons of the group medians were performed with nonparametric methods and a pairwise group comparison (α=.05).

      Results

      Three-dimensionally printed zirconia revealed median outcomes of 95 μm (margin), 252 μm (cusp), 305 μm (fossa), and 184 μm (3D internal adaptation). CAM showed median values of 65 μm (margin), 128 μm (cusp), 203 μm (fossa), and 120 μm (3D internal adaptation). The respective values for the group HPR were 118 μm (margin), 251 μm (cusp), 409 μm (fossa), and 180 μm (3D internal adaptation). Significant differences (P<.001) between CAM and 3DP (cusp, fossa, 3D internal adaptation) and between CAM and HPR (all regions) were found, with the former group showing higher accuracies. The trueness showed median discrepancies of 26 μm (3DP), 13 μm (CAM), and 29 μm (HPR) with significant differences (P<.001) for the comparisons 3DP-CAM and CAM-HPR.

      Conclusions

      Three-dimensionally printed zirconia occlusal veneers produced by means of lithography-based ceramic manufacturing exhibit a marginal adaptation (95 μm) and a production accuracy (26 μm) similar to those of conventional methods.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lussi A.
        • Carvalho T.S.
        Erosive tooth wear: a multifactorial condition of growing concern and increasing knowledge.
        Monogr Oral Sci. 2014; 25: 1-15
        • Shellis R.P.
        • Addy M.
        The interactions between attrition, abrasion and erosion in tooth wear.
        Monogr Oral Sci. 2014; 25: 32-45
        • Loomans B.
        • Opdam N.
        • Attin T.
        • Bartlett D.
        • Edelhoff D.
        • Frankenberger R.
        • et al.
        Severe tooth wear: European consensus statement on management guidelines.
        J Adhes Dent. 2017; 19: 111-119
        • Ioannidis A.
        • Muhlemann S.
        • Ozcan M.
        • Husler J.
        • Hammerle C.H.F.
        • Benic G.I.
        Ultra-thin occlusal veneers bonded to enamel and made of ceramic or hybrid materials exhibit load-bearing capacities not different from conventional restorations.
        J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019; 90: 433-440
        • Maeder M.
        • Pasic P.
        • Ender A.
        • Ozcan M.
        • Benic G.I.
        • Ioannidis A.
        Load-bearing capacities of ultra-thin occlusal veneers bonded to dentin.
        J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019; 95: 165-171
        • Al-Akhali M.
        • Chaar M.S.
        • Elsayed A.
        • Samran A.
        • Kern M.
        Fracture resistance of ceramic and polymer-based occlusal veneer restorations.
        J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017; 74: 245-250
        • Guess P.C.
        • Selz C.F.
        • Steinhart Y.N.
        • Stampf S.
        • Strub J.R.
        Prospective clinical split-mouth study of pressed and CAD-CAM all-ceramic partial-coverage restorations: 7-year results.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2013; 26: 21-25
        • Ioannidis A.
        • Bomze D.
        • Hammerle C.H.F.
        • Husler J.
        • Birrer O.
        • Muhlemann S.
        Load-bearing capacity of CAD-CAM 3D-printed zirconia, CAD-CAM milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate ultra-thin occlusal veneers on molars.
        Dent Mater. 2020; 36: e109-e116
        • Schwartz N.L.
        • Whitsett L.D.
        • Berry T.G.
        • Stewart J.L.
        Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life-span and causes for loss of serviceability.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 1970; 81: 1395-1401
        • White S.N.
        • Ingles S.
        • Kipnis V.
        Influence of marginal opening on microleakage of cemented artificial crowns.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71: 257-264
        • Guazzato M.
        • Albakry M.
        • Ringer S.P.
        • Swain M.V.
        Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part I. Pressable and alumina glass-infiltrated ceramics.
        Dent Mater. 2004; 20: 441-448
        • Papadiochou S.
        • Pissiotis A.L.
        Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: a systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 545-551
        • Kirsch C.
        • Ender A.
        • Attin T.
        • Mehl A.
        Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD/CAM systems.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21: 551-558
        • Zhang Y.
        • Kim J.W.
        • Bhowmick S.
        • Thompson V.P.
        • Rekow E.D.
        Competition of fracture mechanisms in monolithic dental ceramics: flat model systems.
        J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009; 88: 402-411
        • Deng Y.
        • Miranda P.
        • Pajares A.
        • Guiberteau F.
        • Lawn B.R.
        Fracture of ceramic/ceramic/polymer trilayers for biomechanical applications.
        J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003; 67: 828-833
        • Coelho P.G.
        • Silva N.R.
        • Bonfante E.A.
        • Guess P.C.
        • Rekow E.D.
        • Thompson V.P.
        Fatigue testing of two porcelain-zirconia all-ceramic crown systems.
        Dent Mater. 2009; 25: 1122-1127
        • Mörikofer N.
        • Benic G.I.
        • Park J.M.
        • Ozcan M.
        • Hüsler J.
        • Ioannidis A.
        An increase in internal accuracy raised the load-bearing capacity of minimally invasive lithium disilicate occlusal veneers.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2020;
        • Schwentenwein M.
        • Homa J.
        Additive manufacturing of dense alumina ceramics.
        Int J Appl Ceram Tech. 2015; 12: 1-7
        • Ebert J.
        • Ozkol E.
        • Zeichner A.
        • Uibel K.
        • Weiss O.
        • Koops U.
        • et al.
        Direct inkjet printing of dental prostheses made of zirconia.
        J Dent Res. 2009; 88: 673-676
        • Park J.M.
        • Hammerle C.H.F.
        • Benic G.I.
        Digital technique for in vivo assessment of internal and marginal fit of fixed dental prostheses.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 118: 452-454
        • Zeltner M.
        • Sailer I.
        • Muhlemann S.
        • Ozcan M.
        • Hammerle C.H.
        • Benic G.I.
        Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 354-362
        • Homsy F.R.
        • Ozcan M.
        • Khoury M.
        • Majzoub Z.A.K.
        Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120: 530-536
        • Rippe M.P.
        • Monaco C.
        • Volpe L.
        • Bottino M.A.
        • Scotti R.
        • Valandro L.F.
        Different methods for inlay production: effect on internal and marginal adaptation, adjustment time, and contact point.
        Oper Dent. 2017; 42: 436-444
        • Tsitrou E.A.
        • Northeast S.E.
        • van Noort R.
        Brittleness index of machinable dental materials and its relation to the marginal chipping factor.
        J Dent. 2007; 35: 897-902
        • Tinschert J.
        • Natt G.
        • Hassenpflug S.
        • Spiekermann H.
        Status of current CAD/CAM technology in dental medicine.
        Int J Comput Dent. 2004; 7: 25-45
        • Hamza T.A.
        • Sherif R.M.
        In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 762-766
        • Tsirogiannis P.
        • Reissmann D.R.
        • Heydecke G.
        Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 328-335.e2
        • Goujat A.
        • Abouelleil H.
        • Colon P.
        • Jeannin C.
        • Pradelle N.
        • Seux D.
        • et al.
        Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: a systematic review of in vitro studies.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121: 590-597.e3
        • Schaefer O.
        • Watts D.C.
        • Sigusch B.W.
        • Kuepper H.
        • Guentsch A.
        Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility.
        Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 320-326
        • Holst S.
        • Karl M.
        • Wichmann M.
        • Matta R.E.
        A new triple-scan protocol for 3D fit assessment of dental restorations.
        Quintessence Int. 2011; 42: 651-657
        • Dahl B.E.
        • Ronold H.J.
        • Dahl J.E.
        Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 400-404
        • Segerstrom S.
        • Wiking-Lima de Faria J.
        • Braian M.
        • Ameri A.
        • Ahlgren C.
        A validation study of the impression replica technique.
        J Prosthodont. 2019; 28: e609-e616