Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Effect of ultraviolet protective agents on maxillofacial silicone elastomer, part 2: Mechanical properties after artificial aging

      Abstract

      Statement of problem

      The addition of ultraviolet (UV) protectives may affect the materials’ mechanical properties, which can limit the service life of facial prostheses.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of UV protectives on the mechanical properties of maxillofacial silicones after artificial aging.

      Material and methods

      Six color groups (unpigmented, white, yellow, red, blue, and mixed) of addition-type maxillofacial silicone were prepared. Four UV protectives, benzophenone-3 (UV-BP), ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (UV-EM), titanium dioxide (UV-TD), and ethylhexyl salicylate (UV-ES), at 0.5% and 1% concentrations by weight were incorporated into the silicone before polymerization. The specimens were subjected to accelerated aging in a weathering chamber for 300 and 600 hours and to thermocycling. The tensile strength and percentage elongation, tear strength, and hardness of maxillofacial silicones were evaluated. Data were analyzed by using 4-way ANOVA. The differences were compared by the Tukey honestly significant difference test (α=.05).

      Results

      Tensile strength decreased after 300 and 600 hours of UV aging in 0.5% and 1% UV-BP protective–added groups and increased in thermocycled groups (P<.05). Aging conditions generally showed no effect on the tensile strength of UV-EM, UV-TD, and UV-ES added groups (P>.05). Aging generated a decrease in percentage elongation values compared with nonaged specimens of groups (P<.05). The addition of UV protectives generally did not significantly affect the tear strength of specimens compared with control in the aged groups (P>.05). The hardness of UV protective–added groups increased when compared with that of nonaged groups after 300 and 600 hours of UV aging (P<.05). Also, thermally aged groups showed increased hardness than nonaged groups (P<.05).

      Conclusions

      The protective UV-BP addition caused decreased tensile strength, percentage elongation, and tear strength in both concentrations. The UV-EM and UV-ES provided increases in tensile strength and percentage elongation of the silicone in the 0.5% concentration. The addition of UV-BP, UV-EM, and UV-ES did not make significant differences; however, UV-TD significantly decreased the hardness values of the silicone.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hatamleh M.M.
        • Polyzois G.L.
        • Nuseir A.
        • Hatamleh K.
        • Alnazzawi A.
        Mechanical properties and simulated aging of silicone maxillofacial elastomers: advancements in the past 45 years.
        J Prosthodont. 2016; 25: 418-426
        • Zayed S.M.
        • Alshimy A.M.
        • Fahmy A.E.
        Effect of surface treated silicon dioxide nanoparticles on some mechanical properties of maxillofacial silicone elastomer.
        Int J Biomater. 2014; 2014: 750398
        • Mouzakis D.E.
        • Papadopoulos T.D.
        • Polyzois G.L.
        • Griniari P.G.
        Dynamic mechanical properties of a maxillofacial silicone elastomer incorporating a ZnO additive: the effect of artificial aging.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21: 1867-1871
        • Hulterström A.K.
        • Berglund A.
        • Ruyter I.E.
        Wettability, water sorption and water solubility of seven silicone elastomers used for maxillofacial prostheses.
        J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008; 19: 225-231
        • Hu X.
        • Pan X.
        • Johnston W.M.
        Effects of pigments on dynamic mechanical properties of a maxillofacial prosthetic elastomer.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1298-1303
        • Polyzois G.L.
        • Tarantili P.A.
        • Frangou M.J.
        • Andreopoulos A.G.
        Physical properties of a silicone prosthetic elastomer stored in simulated skin secretions.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83: 572-577
        • Hatamleh M.M.
        • Polyzois G.L.
        • Silikas N.
        • Watts D.C.
        Effect of extraoral aging conditions on mechanical properties of maxillofacial silicone elastomer.
        J Prosthodont. 2011; 20: 439-446
        • Visser A.
        • Raghoebar G.M.
        • van Oort R.P.
        • Vissink A.
        Fate of implant-retained craniofacial prostheses: life span and aftercare.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23: 89-98
        • Mitra A.
        • Choudhary S.
        • Garg H.
        • Jagadeesh H.G.
        Maxillofacial prosthetic materials- an inclination towards silicones.
        J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8: ZE08-ZE13
        • Nguyen C.T.
        • Chambers M.S.
        • Powers J.M.
        • Kiat-Amnuay S.
        Effect of opacifiers and UV absorbers on pigmented maxillofacial silicone elastomer, part 2: mechanical properties after artificial aging.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 402-410
        • Eleni P.N.
        • Katsavou I.
        • Krokida M.K.
        • Polyzois G.L.
        • Gettleman L.
        Mechanical behavior of facial prosthetic elastomers after outdoor weathering.
        Dent Mater. 2009; 25: 1493-1502
        • Tetteh S.
        • Bibb R.J.
        • Martin S.J.
        Mechanical and morphological effect of plant based antimicrobial solutions on maxillofacial silicone elastomer.
        Materials (Basel). 2018; 30: 925
        • Han Y.
        • Powers J.M.
        • Kiat-Amnuay S.
        Effect of opacifiers and UV absorbers on pigmented maxillofacial silicone elastomer, part 1: color stability after artificial aging.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 397-401
        • Meszároš O.
        • Schmidt P.
        • Pospíšil J.
        • Nešpůrek S.
        Photooxidation of poly [methyl (phenyl) silylene] and effect of photostabilizers.
        Polymer Degrad Stab. 2006; 91: 573-578
        • Beatty M.W.
        • Mahanna G.K.
        • Jia W.
        Ultraviolet radiation-induced color shifts occurring in oil-pigmented maxillofacial elastomers.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 82: 441-446
        • Bryant A.W.
        • Schaaf N.G.
        • Casey D.M.
        The use of a photoprotective agent to increase the color stability of a tinted extraoral prosthetic silicone.
        J Prosthodont. 1994; 3: 96-102
        • Kiat-Amnuay S.
        • Lemon J.C.
        • Powers J.M.
        Effect of opacifiers on color stability of pigmented maxillofacial silicone A-2186 subjected to artificial aging.
        J Prosthodont. 2002; 11: 109-116
        • Akash R.N.
        • Guttal S.S.
        Effect of incorporation of nano-oxides on color stability of maxillofacial silicone elastomer subjected to outdoor weathering.
        J Prosthodont. 2015; 24: 569-575
        • Bangera B.S.
        • Guttal S.S.
        Evaluation of varying concentrations of nano-oxides as ultraviolet protective agents when incorporated in maxillofacial silicones: an in vitro study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1567-1572
        • Tran N.H.
        • Scarbecz M.
        • Gary J.J.
        In vitro evaluation of color change in maxillofacial elastomer through the use of an ultraviolet light absorber and a hindered amine light stabilizer.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91: 483-490
        • Kiat-amnuay S.
        • Beerbower M.
        • Powers J.M.
        • Paravina R.D.
        Influence of pigments and opacifiers on color stability of silicone maxillofacial elastomer.
        J Dent. 2009; 37: e45-e50
        • Han Y.
        • Zhao Y.
        • Xie C.
        • Powers J.M.
        • Kiat-amnuay S.
        Color stability of pigmented maxillofacial silicone elastomer: effects of nano-oxides as opacifiers.
        J Dent. 2010; 38: e100-e105
        • Kheur M.
        • Sethi T.
        • Coward T.
        • Kakade D.
        • Rajkumar M.
        Evaluation of the effect of ultraviolet stabilizers on the change in color of pigmented silicone elastomer: an in vitro study.
        J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016; 16: 276-281
        • Kheur M.G.
        • Kakade D.
        • Trevor C.J.
        • Lakha T.A.
        • Sethi T.
        Effect of newly developed pigments and ultraviolet absorbers on the color change of pigmented silicone elastomer.
        J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017; 17: 395-400
        • ASTM International
        ASTM D412:2006. Standard test methods for vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic elastomers-tension.
        ASTM International, West Conshohocken2006
        • ASTM International
        ASTM D624:2007. Standard test method for tear strength of conventional vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic elastomers.
        ASTM International, West Conshohocken2007
        • ASTM International
        ASTM D2240-05:2010 Standard test method for rubber property - durometer hardness.
        ASTM International, West Conshohocken2010