Statement of problem
High-translucency monolithic multilayer precolored zirconia provides acceptable esthetics and eliminates chipping of the veneering porcelain. However, the color is not always consistent with the standard Vita shade guide, and the color saturation may vary with the thickness of the zirconia.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to characterize the effect of thickness on the color accuracy of high-translucency monolithic multilayer precolored zirconia.
Material and methods
Plate-shaped (20×20 mm) Vita A2 shade high-translucency monolithic multilayer precolored zirconia specimens of 3 types (SHT Multilayer, AT Multilayer, and 3D Multilayer) in 4 thicknesses (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm) were fabricated (N=120, n=10). A spectrophotometer was used to measure the color attributes (CIELab) against gray or A2 substrates to evaluate the color accuracy based on differences in color (ΔE) (versus the Vita shade guide) and chroma. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Pearson correlation, 2-way ANOVA, and post hoc Scheffé test (α=.05).
Against gray substrates, thickness was significantly positively correlated with all color attributes. Against A2 substrates, L∗ values increased with an increase in thickness; however, a∗, b∗, and chroma values remained stable. Zirconia with a thickness of 1.0 mm exhibited the lowest ΔE, regardless of the type, except for AT Multilayer against A2 substrates, where the lowest ΔE was achieved at 0.5 mm. At thicknesses ≥1.0 mm, the ΔE between the 2 substrates was imperceivable.
Thickness affected the color accuracy of different high-translucency monolithic multilayer precolored zirconia types. It appears that the optimal thickness in terms of color accuracy is 1.0 mm. These results could be used as a reference for the selection and preparation of abutments in clinical applications.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Metal-free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 12: CD009606
- Novel zirconia materials in dentistry.J Dent Res. 2017; 97: 140-147
- Mechanical reliability, fatigue strength and survival analysis of new polycrystalline translucent zirconia ceramics for monolithic restorations.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018; 85: 57-65
- Influence of abutment material on the shade of dental implant restorations in the esthetic zone: a single case report.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2019; 11: 73-80
- All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs).Dent Mater. 2015; 31: 603-623
- All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs.Dent Mater. 2015; 31: 624-639
- New multi-layered zirconias: composition, microstructure and translucency.Dent Mater. 2019; 35: 797-806
- A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses.Clin Oral Implant Res. 2018; 29: 184-198
- Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98: e17385
- Computable translucency as a function of thickness in a multi-layered zirconia.J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121: 683-689
- The mechanical behavior of high-translucent monolithic zirconia after adjustment and finishing procedures and artificial aging.J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 123: 330-337
- Comparison of the mechanical properties of translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate.J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120: 132-137
- Wear analysis and topographical properties of monolithic zirconia and CoCr against human enamel after polishing and glazing procedures.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020; 105: 103712
- The effect of coloring liquids on the translucency of zirconia framework.J Adv Prosthodont. 2013; 5: 448-451
- Comparison of the translucency of shaded zirconia all-ceramic systems.J Adv Prosthodont. 2014; 6: 415-422
- Effect of ceramic translucency and luting cement shade on the color masking ability of laminate veneers.Dent Res J. 2019; 16: 193
- Effect of nanoparticles modified glass ionomer cement on the colour and shear bond strength of lithium disilicate ceramic.Egypt Dent J. 2019; 65: 813-824
- Monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge. optical properties, wear, and clinical performance.Dent J. 2019; 7: 90
- The effect of restoration thickness and resin cement shade on the color and translucency of a high-translucency monolithic zirconia.J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 123: 149-154
- Zirconia in fixed prosthesis. A literature review.J Clin Exp Dent. 2014; 6: e66-e73
- A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses after a mean observation period of at least 5 years.Clin Oral Implant Res. 2017; 28: 1421-1432
- Shear bond strength of porcelain to a base-metal compared to zirconia core.J Dent Biomater. 2017; 4: 367-372
- Survival of 2039 complete arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: a retrospective study.J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 220-224
- Fracture rate of monolithic zirconia restorations up to 5 years: a dental laboratory survey.J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 436-439
- Color aspect of monolithic zirconia restorations: a review of the literature.J Prosthodont. 2018; 28: 276-287
- Effect of aging process on some properties of conventional and multilayered translucent zirconia for monolithic restorations.Ceram Int. 2020; 46: 1854-1868
- Effect of the number of coloring liquid applications on the optical properties of monolithic zirconia.Dent Mater. 2014; 30: e229-e237
- Effect of coloring and sintering on the translucency and biaxial strength of monolithic zirconia.J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 308.e1-308.e7
- Influence of coloring procedure on flexural resistance of zirconia blocks.J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114: 98-102
- Zirconia use in dentistry - Manufacturing and properties.Curr Health Sci J. 2019; 45: 28-35
- Effects of surface treatments on the translucency, opalescence, and surface texture of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics.J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115: 773-779
- Effect of hydrothermal aging on the optical properties of precolored dental monolithic zirconia ceramics.J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 121: 676-682
- Effect of the amount of thickness reduction on color and translucency of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics.J Adv Prosthodont. 2016; 8: 37-42
- Effect of thickness of monolithic zirconia ceramic on final color.J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120: 257-262
- Effect of shading technique and thickness on color stability and translucency of new generation translucent zirconia.J Dent. 2018; 73: 19-23
- Fatigue failure load and finite element analysis of multilayer ceramic restorations.Dent Mater. 2019; 35: 64-73
- Evaluation of dual-cure resin cement polymerization under different types and thicknesses of monolithic zirconia.Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019: 4567854
- A novel method for testing the veridicality of dental colour assessments.Eur J Orthodont. 2011; 34: 19-24
- The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations.Color Res Appl. 2005; 30: 21-30
- Euclidean color space in high agreement with the CIE94 color difference formula.Color Res Appl. 2000; 25: 64-65
- Clinical evaluation of perceptibility of color differences between natural teeth and all-ceramic crowns.J Dent. 2009; 37: e57-e63
- Effect of thickness and surface modifications on flexural strength of monolithic zirconia.J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 987-993
Published online: August 23, 2021
C.-M. K. and T.-Y. P. contributed equally to this work.
© 2021 by the Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.