Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Research and Education|Articles in Press

Maintenance protocols for implant-supported dental prostheses: A scoping review

Published:December 17, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.026

      Abstract

      Statement of the problem

      Biological complications of implant-supported prostheses remain a concern. Therefore, standardizing hygiene protocols to promote their maintenance is important.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this scoping review was to identify available hygiene guidance for home care procedures, as well as periodicity and protocols for the professional maintenance of implant-supported prostheses.

      Material and methods

      This study was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the study protocol was made available at: https://osf.io/5jdeh/. The search was last performed in the PubMed database on March 15, 2022 and was undertaken by 2 independent researchers. Clinical studies and reviews that evaluated home care and maintenance protocols for dental implant-supported prostheses (fixed or removable), without language restriction or year of publication, were included. A descriptive analysis was performed considering study characteristics (study design, restorative assembly, maintenance strategies, eligibility criteria, number of included studies, quality/level of evidence, and main findings).

      Results

      The initial search yielded 3138 studies, of which 18 were included for descriptive analysis (6 critical reviews, 4 clinical trials, 3 systematic reviews, 2 guideline reports, 2 retrospective studies, and 1 transversal study). The main instrument recommended for home care was the use of a conventional toothbrush associated with triclosan-containing toothpaste in addition to interproximal aids (brushes or floss) for all types of restorations. The use of irrigation instruments was also frequently considered. For professional maintenance, almost all studies reported a positive effect of regular recalls every 3 months during the first year, followed by less regular recalls according to the motivation of the patient and home care efficacy. At each recall, the professional should evaluate the patient history, oral tissues, implant, abutments, and restorations, as well as perform professional cleaning of the prostheses with appropriate instruments so that the implants and abutments may be preserved.

      Conclusions

      Establishing an adequate hygiene protocol is indispensable for implant-supported restorations. To do so, the professional must guide and support the patient’s home care by taking into account the patient’s motivation and efficacy during the hygiene procedures. Also, for professional maintenance, the periodicity of recalls should be constant and include an evaluation of the condition of the restoration and adjacent tissues, followed by professional cleaning of prostheses, implants, and abutments, in addition to new instructions to improve patient home care.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Esposito M.
        • Worthington H.V.
        • Thomsen P.
        • Coulthard P.
        Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining health around dental implants.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; 3: CD003069
        • Pjetursson B.E.
        • Thoma D.
        • Jung R.
        • Zwahlen M.
        • Zembic A.
        A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years.
        Clin Oral Implant Res. 2012; 23: 22-38
        • Salles M.M.
        • Oliveira V.C.
        • Macedo A.P.
        • Nascimento C.
        • Silva-Lovato C.H.
        • Paranhos H.F.O.
        Brushing associated with oral irrigation in maintaining implants and overdentures hygiene - a randomized clinical trial.
        Odontology. 2021; 109: 284-294
        • Al Ghazal L.
        • O'Sullivan J.
        • Claffey N.
        • Polyzois I.
        Comparison of two different techniques used for the maintenance of peri-implant soft tissue health: a pilot randomized clinical trial.
        Acta Odontol Scand. 2017; 75: 542-549
        • Fugazzotto P.A.
        Success and failure rates of osseointegrated implants in function in regenerated boné for 72 to 133 months.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp. 2005; 20: 77-83
        • Chochlidakis K.
        • Einarsdottir E.
        • Tsigarida A.
        • Papaspyridakos P.
        • Romeo D.
        • Barmak A.B.
        • et al.
        Survival rates and prosthetic complications of implant fixed complete dental prostheses: An up to 5-year retrospective study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 124: 539-546
        • Gualini F.
        • Berglundh T.
        Immuno histochemical characteristics of inflammatory lesions at implants.
        J Clin Perio. 2003; 30: 14-18
        • Fürst M.M.
        • Salvi G.E.
        • Lang N.P.
        • Persson G.R.
        Bacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implants.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18: 501-508
        • Monje A.
        • Aranda L.
        • Diaz K.T.
        • Alarcón M.A.
        • Bagramian R.A.
        • Wang H.L.
        • et al.
        Impact of Maintenance Therapy for the Prevention of Peri-implant Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
        J Dent Res. 2016; 95: 372-379
        • Bidra A.S.
        • Daubert D.M.
        • Garcia L.T.
        • Kosinski T.F.
        • Nenn C.A.
        • Olsen J.A.
        • et al.
        Clinical Practice Guidelines for Recall and Maintenance of Patients with Tooth-Borne and Implant-Borne Dental Restorations.
        J Prosthodont. 2016; 25: S32-S40
        • Bidra A.S.
        • Daubert D.M.
        • Garcia L.T.
        • Gauthier M.F.
        • Kosinski T.F.
        • Nenn C.A.
        • et al.
        A Systematic Review of Recall Regimen and Maintenance Regimen of Patients with Dental Restorations. Part 2: Implant-Borne Restorations.
        J Prosthodont. 2016; 25: S16-S31
        • Ziebolz D.
        • Klipp S.
        • Schmalz G.
        • Schmickler J.
        • Rinke S.
        • Kottmann T.
        • et al.
        Comparison of different maintenance strategies within supportive implant therapy for prevention of peri-implant inflammation during the first year after implant restoration. A randomized, dental hygiene practice-based multicenter study.
        Am J Dent. 2017; 30: 190-196
        • Cheung M.C.
        • Hopcraft M.S.
        • Darby I.B.
        Dentists' preferences in implant maintenance and hygiene instruction.
        Aust Dent J. 2021; 66: 278-288
        • Aeran H.
        • Kumar V.
        • Sood M.
        • Vishnoi L.
        Maintenance protocol for implant supported restorations: An overview.
        Int J Oral Health Dent. 2018; 4: 139-142
        • Hoerler S.B.
        • Nietz S.K.
        • Zook V.L.
        • Lohse C.M.
        • Salinas T.J.
        • Carr A.B.
        • et al.
        Consistency of Dental Hygiene Therapy Utilizing Various Dental Hygiene Instrumentation and Its Effect on Peri-implant Health and Survival of Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32: 1371-1376
        • Clark D.
        • Levin L.
        Dental implant management and maintenance: How to improve long-term implant success?.
        Quintessence Int. 2016; 47: 417-423
        • Louropoulou A.
        • Slot D.E.
        • Van der Weijden F.
        Mechanical self-performed oral hygiene of implant supported restorations: a systematic review.
        J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2014; 14: 60-69.e1
        • Palmer R.M.
        • Pleasance C.
        Maintenance of osseointegrated implant prostheses.
        Dent Update. 2006; 33: 84-86,89-92
        • Murgueitio R.
        • Dussan J.
        • Rios H.
        • Avila-Ortiz G.
        Visual labels to facilitate hygiene around implant-supported complete fixed dental prostheses.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1588-1590
        • Akmal N.L.H.B.I.
        • Duraisamy R.
        Evaluation of the Marginal Fit of Implant-Supported Crowns.
        J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2020; 30: 165-172
        • Armitage G.C.
        • Xenoudi P.
        Post-treatment supportive care for the natural dentition and dental implants.
        Periodontol 2000. 2016; 71: 164-184
        • Roman-Torres C.V.G.
        • Pasquinelli F.
        • Pimentel A.C.
        • de Melo M.P.
        • Rego R.O.
        • Sendyk W.R.
        The Effects of Annual Maintenance on Peri-implant Health in Patients Rehabilitated with Overdentures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019; 34: 159-164
        • Kelekis-Cholakis A.
        • Rothney J.
        Maintenance of Implant Patients: A Narrative Review.
        Implant Dent. 2019; 28: 161-172
        • Tarawali K.
        Maintenance and Monitoring of Dental Implants in General Dental Practice.
        Dent Update. 2015; 42: 517-518
        • Peters M.D.J.
        • Godfrey C.M.
        • Khalil H.
        • McInerney P.
        • Parker D.
        • Soares C.B.
        Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.
        Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13: 141-146
        • Tricco A.C.
        • Lillie E.
        • Zarin W.
        • Brien K.K.O.
        • Colquhoun H.
        • Levac D.
        • et al.
        Research and reporting methods PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation.
        Ann Interm Med. 2018; 169: 467-473
        • Rösing C.K.
        • Fiorini T.
        • Haas A.N.
        • Muniz F.W.M.G.
        • Oppermann R.V.
        • Susin C.
        The impact of maintenance on peri-implant health.
        Braz Oral Res. 2019; 33: e074
        • Bunk D.
        • Eisenburger M.
        • Häckl S.
        • Eberhard J.
        • Stiesch M.
        • Grischke J.
        The effect of adjuvant oral irrigation on self-administered oral care in the management of peri-implant mucositis: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020; 31: 946-958
        • Schembri A.
        • Fiske J.
        The implications of visual impairment in an elderly population in recognizing oral disease and maintaining oral health.
        Special Care Dentistry. 2001; 21: 222-226
        • Amarasena N.
        • Gnanamanickam E.S.
        • Miller J.
        Effects of interdental cleaning devices in preventing dental caries and periodontal diseases: a scoping review.
        Aust Dent J. 2019; 64: 327-337
        • van Winkelhoff A.J.
        • Goené R.J.
        • Benschop C.
        • Folmer T.
        Early colonization of dental implants by putative periodontal pathogens in partially edentulous patients.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000; 11: 511-520
        • Able F.B.
        • Campanha N.H.
        • Younes I.A.
        • Sartori I.A.M.
        Evaluation of the intaglio surface shape of implant-supported complete-arch maxillary prostheses and its association with biological complications: An analytical cross-sectional study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 128: 174-180
        • Mok J.
        • Emami E.
        • Kobayashi T.
        • Feine J.S.
        An oral hygiene brochure for your implant overdenture patients.
        J Can Dent Assoc. 2007; 73: 713
        • Zhou H.
        • Jiao Y.
        • Ma C.F.
        • Wang C.
        • Zhao S.J.
        • Tian M.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes of implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the bar and magnetic attachment systems: an up to 5-year retrospective study.
        Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8: 1360