Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Polyetheretherketone subperiosteal implant retaining a maxillary fixed prosthesis: A case series


      Statement of problem

      Patients needing dental rehabilitation of a complete atrophic maxilla would benefit from simplified treatment plans.


      The purpose of this case series was to demonstrate the prosthetic management of 4 edentulous patients with severe maxillary ridge resorption who declined multiple stage surgery and sought a fixed prosthesis in single-stage surgery.

      Material and methods

      The patients were provided with completely digital computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured (CAD-CAM) polyetheretherketone (PEEK) maxillary subperiosteal frameworks, which were surgically placed in a 1-step procedure. The patients were followed up for 12 months and evaluated for signs of implant rejection, infection, prosthetic fracture or mobility, or implant exposure.


      At the 12-month follow-up, all the implants were functionally stable with healthy soft tissue and showed no sign of prosthetic fracture, infection, or pus discharge.


      PEEK subperiosteal implants for maxillary atrophied ridges can be considered a promising treatment option within the limitations of this clinical study with low patient numbers and a short observational time.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Cawood J.I.
        • Howell R.A.
        A classification of the edentulous jaws.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988; 17: 232-236
        • Prados-Privado M.
        • Diederich H.
        • Prados-Frutos J.
        Implant treatment in atrophic maxilla by titanium hybrid-plates: a finite element study to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of plates.
        Metals (Basel). 2018; 8: 573
        • Dahlin C.
        • Johansson A.
        Iliac crest autogenous bone graft versus alloplastic graft and guided bone regeneration in the reconstruction of atrophic maxillae: a 5-year retrospective study on cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011; 13: 305-310
      1. Maxillary sinus elevation difficulty score with lateral wall technique.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020; 35: 631-638
        • Maló P.
        • de Araujo Nobre M.
        • Lopes I.
        A new approach to rehabilitate the severely atrophic maxilla using extramaxillary anchored implants in immediate function: a pilot study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 100: 354-366
        • Chiapasco M.
        • Casentini P.
        • Zaniboni M.
        Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 237-259
        • Aghaloo T.
        • Misch C.
        • Lin G.-H.
        • Iacono V.
        • Wang H.-L.
        Bone augmentation of the edentulous maxilla for implant placement: a systematic review.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 31: 19-30
        • Dimitroulis G.
        • Gupta B.
        • Wilson I.
        • Hart C.
        The atrophic edentulous alveolus. A preliminary study on a new generation of subperiosteal implants.
        Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 1: 1-10
        • Mounir M.
        • Atef M.
        • Titanium M.M.H.
        • Abou-Elfetouh A.
        • Hakam M.M.
        Titanium and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) patient-specific sub-periosteal implants: two novel approaches for rehabilitation of the severely atrophic anterior maxillary ridge.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 47: 1-7
        • Bai L.
        • Zheng L.
        • Ji P.
        • et al.
        Additively manufactured lattice-like subperiosteal implants for rehabilitation of the severely atrophic ridge.
        J ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022; 8: 912-920
        • Van den Borre C.
        • Rinaldi M.
        • De Neef B.
        • et al.
        Patient- and clinician-reported outcomes for the additively manufactured sub-periosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) in the maxilla: a prospective multicentre one-year follow-up study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 51: 243-250
        • Harb I.E.
        • Abdel-Khalek E.A.
        • Hegazy S.A.
        CAD/CAM constructed poly(etheretherketone) (PEEK) framework of kennedy class I removable partial denture: a clinical report.
        J Prosthodont. 2019; 28: 595-598
        • Negm E.E.
        • Aboutaleb F.A.
        • Alam-Eldein A.M.
        Virtual evaluation of the accuracy of fit and trueness in maxillary poly(etheretherketone) removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by direct and indirect CAD/CAM techniques.
        J Prosthodont. 2019; 28: 804-810
        • Haleem A.
        • Javaid M.
        Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and its 3D printed implants applications in medical field: an overview.
        Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019; 7: 571-577
        • Atef M.
        • Mounir M.
        • Shawky M.
        • Mounir S.
        • Gibaly A.
        Polyetheretherketone patient-specific implants (PPSI) for the reconstruction of two different mandibular contour deformities.
        Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 26: 299-309
        • Mommaerts M.Y.
        Evolutionary steps in the design and biofunctionalization of the additively manufactured sub-periosteal jaw implant “AMSJI” for the maxilla.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 48: 108-114
        • Bakiri E.
        • Kourtis S.
        PEEK high performance polymers: review of properties and clinical applications in prosthodontics and restorative dentistry.
        Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2019; 27: 113-121
        • Benli M.
        • Gümüş B.E.
        • Kahraman Y.
        • et al.
        Thermal, structural and morphological characterization of dental polymers for clinical applications.
        J Prosthodont Res. 2021; 65: 176-185
        • Blanch-Martínez N.
        • Arias-Herrera S.
        • Martinez-González A.
        Behavior of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in prostheses on dental implants. A review.
        J Clin Exp Dent. 2021; 13: 520-526
        • Wang L.
        • He S.
        • Wu X.
        • et al.
        Polyetheretherketone/nano-fluorohydroxyapatite composite with antimicrobial activity and osseointegration properties.
        Biomaterials. 2014; 35: 6758-6775
        • Uhrenbacher J.
        • Schmidlin P.R.
        • Keul C.
        • et al.
        The effect of surface modification on the retention strength of polyetheretherketone crowns adhesively bonded to dentin abutments.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 122: 1489-1497
        • Stawarczyk B.
        • Jordan P.
        • Schmidlin P.R.
        • et al.
        PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1278-1288
        • Spyropoulos D.
        • Kamposiora P.
        • Zoidis P.
        The effect of surface pretreatment and water storage on the bonding strength of a resin composite cement to modified PEEK.
        Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2020; 25: 121-127
        • Peng T.Y.
        • Shih Y.H.
        • Hsia S.M.
        • et al.
        In vitro assessment of the cell metabolic activity, cytotoxicity, cell attachment, and inflammatory reaction of human oral fibroblasts on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implant–abutment.
        J Polymers. 2021; 13: 2995
        • Wang J.
        • Wu P.
        • Liu H.
        • et al.
        Polyetheretherketone versus titanium CAD-CAM framework for implant-supported fixed complete dentures: a retrospective study with up to 5-year follow-up.
        J Prosthodont Res. 2022; 2: 279-287
        • Reda R.
        • Zanza A.
        • Galli M.
        • De Biase A.
        • Testarelli L.
        • Di Nardo D.
        Applications and clinical behavior of BioHPP in prosthetic dentistry: a short review.
        J Compos Sci. 2022; 6: 90
        • Gama L.T.
        • Bezerra A.P.
        • Schimmel M.
        • Rodrigues Garcia R.C.M.
        • de Luca Canto G.
        • Gonçalves T.M.S.V.
        Clinical performance of polymer frameworks in dental prostheses: a systematic review.
        J Prosthet Dent. 11 April 2022; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Papathanasiou I.
        • Kamposiora P.
        • Papavasiliou G.
        • Ferrari M.
        The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: a narrative review.
        BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20: 1-11
        • Salles M.M.
        • Oliveira V.D.C.
        • Macedo A.P.
        • do Nascimento C.
        • Silva-Lovato C.H.
        • Paranhos H.D.F.O.
        Brushing associated with oral irrigation in maintaining implants and overdentures hygiene – a randomized clinical trial.
        Odontology. 2021; 109: 284-294
        • Bodine R.L.
        • Yanase R.T.
        • Bodine A.
        Forty years of experience with subperiosteal implant dentures in 41 edentulous patients.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75: 33-44
        • Watanabe T.
        • Kawahara D.
        • Inoue R.
        • et al.
        Squamous cell carcinoma around a subperiosteal implant in the maxilla and the association of chronic mechanical irritation and peri-implantitis: a case report.
        Int J Implant Dent. 2022; 8: 1-7
        • Igarashi K.
        • Katagiri H.
        • Abou-Ayash S.
        • Schimmel M.
        • Afrashtehfar K.I.
        Double-crown prosthesis retention using polyetherketoneketone (PEKK): an in vitro study.
        J Prosthodont. 28 March 2022; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Wolff D.
        • Wohlrab T.
        • Saure D.
        • Krisam J.
        • Frese C.
        Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses: a 4-year prospective clinical trial evaluating survival, quality, and effects on surrounding periodontal tissues.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 47-52