Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Accuracy and precision of intraoral scanners for shade matching: A systematic review

Published:November 05, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.034

      Abstract

      Statement of problem

      The use of intraoral scanners is rising in prosthetic dentistry; however, systematic analysis of their accuracy and precision for shade matching is scarce.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of intraoral scanners for shade matching.

      Material and methods

      In addition to a manual search, an electronic systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. English-language original studies published between January 1, 2010 and March 1, 2022 with intraoral or digital scanners were chosen based on the keywords of tooth color or shade selection or determination, color or shade matching, accuracy, validity, or trueness, and precision, repeatability, or reproducibility as inclusive criteria. Two reviewers independently performed the literature search, selected the studies, collected the data from the studies included, and evaluated the quality of the studies included using a quality assessment method and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies. A third reviewer resolved disagreements.

      Results

      A total of 17 articles concerning the shade matching accuracy and precision of intraoral scanners were selected and reviewed. Among them, 4 articles evaluated only accuracy, 4 articles assessed only precision, and 9 articles investigated both accuracy and precision. Ten articles reported low levels of shade matching accuracy for intraoral scanners, while 11 articles reported high levels of shade matching precision for intraoral scanners.

      Conclusions

      Based on the current literature, intraoral scanners show acceptable precision but unacceptable accuracy for shade matching.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Michou S.
        • Vannahme C.
        • Bakhshandeh A.
        • Ekstrand K.R.
        • Benetti A.R.
        Intraoral scanner featuring transillumination for proximal caries detection. An in vitro validation study on permanent posterior teeth.
        J Dent. 2022; 116: 103841
        • Schneider H.
        • Ahrens M.
        • Strumpski M.
        • Rüger C.
        • Häfer M.
        • Hüttmann G.
        • et al.
        An intraoral OCT probe to enhanced detection of approximal carious lesions and assessment of restorations.
        J Clin Med. 2020; 9: 3257
        • Michou S.
        • Benetti A.R.
        • Vannahme C.
        • Hermannsson P.G.
        • Bakhshandeh A.
        • Ekstrand K.R.
        Development of a fluorescence-based caries scoring system for an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study.
        Caries Res. 2020; 54: 324-335
        • Schlenz M.A.
        • Schlenz M.B.
        • Wöstmann B.
        • Jungert A.
        • Ganss C.
        Intraoral scanner-based monitoring of tooth wear in young adults: 12-month results.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2022; 26: 1869-1878
        • Charamba C.F.
        • Needy J.
        • Ungar P.S.
        • de Sousa F.B.
        • Eckert G.J.
        • Hara A.T.
        Objective assessment of simulated non-carious cervical lesion by tridimensional digital scanning.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25: 4069-4074
        • Michou S.
        • Vannahme C.
        • Ekstrand K.R.
        • Benetti A.R.
        Detecting early erosive tooth wear using an intraoral scanner system.
        J Dent. 2020; 100: 103445
        • Rebba B.
        • Merlone A.
        • Cantile N.
        • Manazza F.
        • Cattoni F.
        Digital smile planning technique applied to prosthetic rehabilitation of dental esthetic area: a case report.
        J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021; 35: 1-9
        • Rutkunas V.
        • Gedrimiene A.
        • Akulauskas M.
        • Fehmer V.
        • Sailer I.
        • Jegelevicius D.
        In vitro and in vivo accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021; 32: 1444-1454
        • Abduo J.
        • Palamara J.E.A.
        Accuracy of digital impressions versus conventional impressions for 2 implants: an in vitro study evaluating the effect of implant angulation.
        Int J Implant Dent. 2021; 7: 75
        • Ellakany P.
        • Tantawi M.E.
        • Mahrous A.A.
        • Al-Harbi F.
        Evaluation of the accuracy of digital impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral dental scanners with different CAD/CAM scanning technologies: An in vitro study.
        J Prosthodont. 2022; 31: 314-319
        • Michelinakis G.
        • Apostolakis D.
        • Kamposiora P.
        • Papavasiliou G.
        • Özcan M.
        The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review.
        BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21: 37
        • Chi J.
        Digital impressions and in-office CAD/CAM: A review of best practices and what's to come.
        Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2021; 42: 140-141
        • Jung H.T.
        • Kim H.Y.
        • Song S.Y.
        • Park J.H.
        • Lee J.Y.
        Accuracy of implant impression techniques with a scannable healing abutment.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 128: 729-734
        • Gao H.
        • Liu X.
        • Liu M.
        • Yang X.
        • Tan J.
        Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2021; (In press)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.029
        • Derksen W.
        • Tahmaseb A.
        • Wismeijer D.
        A randomized clinical trial comparing the clinical fit of CAD/CAM monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses (FDP) on ti-base abutments based on digital or conventional impression techniques. One year follow-up.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2021; 34: 733-743
        • Elter B.
        • Diker B.
        • Tak Ö.
        Effect of different composite materials used as core build-ups on the trueness of intraoral scanning.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2021; 34: 600-607
        • Li J.
        • Moon H.S.
        • Kim J.H.
        • Yoon H.I.
        • Oh K.C.
        Accuracy of impression-making methods in edentulous arches: An in vitro study encompassing conventional and digital methods.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 128: 479-486
        • Fueki K.
        • Inamochi Y.
        • Wada J.
        • Arai Y.
        • Takaichi A.
        • Murakami N.
        • et al.
        A systematic review of digital removable partial dentures. Part I: Clinical evidence, digital impression, and maxillomandibular relationship record.
        J Prosthodont Res. 2022; 66: 40-52
        • Schlenz M.A.
        • Vogler J.A.H.
        • Schmidt A.
        • Rehmann P.
        • Wöstmann B.
        Chairside measurement of the marginal and internal fit of crowns: a new intraoral scan-based approach.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 24: 2459-2468
        • Fraile C.
        • Ferreiroa A.
        • Romeo M.
        • Alonso R.
        • Pradíes G.
        Clinical study comparing the accuracy of interocclusal records, digitally obtained by three different devices.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2022; 26: 1957-1962
        • Camcı H.
        • Salmanpour F.
        A new technique for testing accuracy and sensitivity of digital bite registration: A prospective comparative study.
        Int Orthod. 2021; 19: 425-432
        • Ries J.M.
        • Grünler C.
        • Wichmann M.
        • Matta R.E.
        Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2021; (In press)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.005
        • Iwauchi Y.
        • Tanaka S.
        • Kamimura-Sugimura E.
        • Baba K.
        Clinical evaluation of the precision of interocclusal registration by using digital and conventional techniques.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 128: 611-617
        • Li L.
        • Chen H.
        • Wang Y.
        • Sun Y.
        Construction of virtual intercuspal occlusion: Considering tooth displacement.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2021; 48: 701-710
        • Jabri M.A.
        • Wu S.
        • Pan Y.
        • Wang L.
        An overview on the veracity of intraoral digital scanning system and utilization of iTero scanner for analyzing orthodontic study models both In-Vivo and Ex-Vivo.
        Niger J Clin Pract. 2021; 24: 1-7
        • Flügge T.V.
        • Schlager S.
        • Nelson K.
        • Nahles S.
        • Metzger M.C.
        Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 144: 471-478
        • Jabri M.A.
        • Wu S.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Wang H.
        • Pan Y.
        • Ma J.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of Bolton's analysis among different malocclusion patients plaster models and digital models obtained by Ex Vivo scanning with iTero scanner in Chinese Han population.
        Niger J Clin Pract. 2021; 24: 1086-1091
        • Zhang Y.
        • Yang C.
        • Li Y.
        • Xia D.
        • Shi T.
        • Li C.
        Comparison of three-dimensional printing guides and double-layer guide plates in accurate bracket placement.
        BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20: 127
        • Tanna N.K.
        • AlMuzaini A.A.A.Y.
        • Mupparapu M.
        Imaging in orthodontics.
        Dent Clin North Am. 2021; 65: 623-641
        • Impellizzeri A.
        • Horodynski M.
        • De Stefano A.
        • Palaia G.
        • Polimeni A.
        • Romeo U.
        • et al.
        CBCT and intra-oral scanner: The advantages of 3D technologies in orthodontic treatment.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17: 9428
        • Li Q.
        • Bi M.
        • Yang K.
        • Liu W.
        The creation of a virtual dental patient with dynamic occlusion and its application in esthetic dentistry.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2021; 126: 14-18
        • Dineen D.S.
        • Brennand Roper M.J.
        Soft tissue surgery and scanners: applications and perspectives into clinical research.
        Br Dent J. 2020; 229: 190-195
        • Mangano F.
        • Gandolfi A.
        • Luongo G.
        • Logozzo S.
        Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature.
        BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17: 149
        • Kook M.S.
        • Kim H.M.
        • Oh H.K.
        • Lee K.M.
        Clear aligner use following surgery-first mandibular prognathism correction.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2019; 30: e544-e547
        • Hassan B.
        • Gimenez Gonzalez B.
        • Tahmaseb A.
        • Greven M.
        • Wismeijer D.
        A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: A pilot clinical study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 486-492
        • Icen M.
        • Orhan K.
        • Şeker Ç.
        • Geduk G.
        • Cakmak Özlü F.
        • Cengiz M.İ.
        Comparison of CBCT with different voxel sizes and intraoral scanner for detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020; 49: 20190197
        • Tabatabaian F.
        • Beyabanaki E.
        • Alirezaei P.
        • Epakchi S.
        Visual and digital tooth shade selection methods, related effective factors and conditions, and their accuracy and precision: A literature review.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33: 1084-1104
        • Hardan L.
        • Bourgi R.
        • Cuevas-Suárez C.E.
        • Lukomska-Szymanska M.
        • Monjarás-Ávila A.J.
        • Zarow M.
        • et al.
        Novel trends in dental color match using different shade selection methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Materials (Basel). 2022; 15: 468
        • Mahn E.
        • Tortora S.C.
        • Olate B.
        • Cacciuttolo F.
        • Kernitsky J.
        • Jorquera G.
        Comparison of visual analog shade matching, a digital visual method with a cross-polarized light filter, and a spectrophotometer for dental color matching.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2021; 125: 511-516
        • Hein S.
        • Modrić D.
        • Westland S.
        • Tomeček M.
        Objective shade matching, communication, and reproduction by combining dental photography and numeric shade quantification.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33: 107-117
        • Borse S.
        • Chaware S.H.
        Tooth shade analysis and selection in prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020; 20: 131-140
        • Koumpia E.
        • Athanasiou A.
        • Eliades T.
        • Knösel M.
        Precision of a reflectance spectrophotometer in measuring anterior tooth color.
        Open Dent J. 2018; 12: 884-895
        • Klotz A.L.
        • Habibi Y.
        • Hassel A.J.
        • Rammelsberg P.
        • Zenthöfer A.
        How reliable and accurate is the shade determination of premolars by spectrophotometry?.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 24: 1439-1444
        • Lehmann K.M.
        • Igiel C.
        • Schmidtmann I.
        • Scheller H.
        Four color-measuring devices compared with a spectrophotometric reference system.
        J Dent. 2010; 38: e65-e70
        • Tsiliagkou A.
        • Diamantopoulou S.
        • Papazoglou E.
        • Kakaboura A.
        Evaluation of reliability and validity of three dental color-matching devices.
        Int J Esthet Dent. 2016; 11: 110-124
        • Tam W.K.
        • Lee H.J.
        Accurate shade image matching by using a smartphone camera.
        J Prosthodont Res. 2017; 61: 168-176
        • Lazar R.
        • Culic B.
        • Gasparik C.
        • Lazar C.
        • Dudea D.
        The accuracy of dental shade matching using cross-polarization photography.
        Int J Comput Dent. 2019; 22: 343-351
        • Lasserre J.F.
        • Pop-Ciutrila I.S.
        • Colosi H.A.
        A comparison between a new visual method of colour matching by intraoral camera and conventional visual and spectrometric methods.
        J Dent. 2011; 39: e29-e36
        • Caglar A.
        • Yamanel K.
        • Gulsahi K.
        • Bagis B.
        • Ozcan M.
        Could digital imaging be an alternative for digital colorimeters?.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2010; 14: 713-718
        • Gehrke P.
        • Riekeberg U.
        • Fackler O.
        • Dhom G.
        Comparison of in vivo visual, spectrophotometric and colorimetric shade determination of teeth and implant-supported crowns.
        Int J Comput Dent. 2009; 12: 247-263
        • Chu S.J.
        • Trushkowsky R.D.
        • Paravina R.D.
        Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects.
        J Dent. 2010; 38: e2-e16
        • Tabatabaian F.
        • Khezri A.S.
        • SAH Ourang
        • Namdari M.
        Assessment of coverage error for two common commercial dental shade guides using a spectrophotometric method.
        Color Res appl. 2022; 47: 528-536
        • Raza F.B.
        • Kumar V.A.
        • Jacob A.
        • Ali A.
        Assessment of a smartphone-based software application as a potential digital tool in tooth shade selection: a prospective clinical study.
        Quintessence Int. 2021; 52: 608-617
        • Rahbani Nobar B.
        • Tabatabaian F.
        • Namdari M.
        Can identical dental shade guides be used interchangeably?.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33: 1150-1159
        • Perez Mdel M.
        • Ghinea R.
        • Herrera L.J.
        • Ionescu A.M.
        • Pomares H.
        • Pulgar R.
        • et al.
        Dental ceramics: a CIEDE2000 acceptability thresholds for lightness, chroma and hue differences.
        J Dent. 2011; 39: e37-e44
        • Paravina R.D.
        • Ghinea R.
        • Herrera L.J.
        • Bona A.D.
        • Igiel C.
        • Linninger M.
        • et al.
        Color difference thresholds in dentistry.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015; 27: S1-S9
        • Khashayar G.
        • Bain P.A.
        • Salari S.
        • Dozic A.
        • Kleverlaan C.J.
        • Feilzer A.J.
        Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for colour differences in dentistry.
        J Dent. 2014; 42: 637-644
        • Ghinea R.
        • Pérez M.M.
        • Herrera L.J.
        • Rivas M.J.
        • Yebra A.
        • Paravina R.D.
        Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics.
        J Dent. 2010; 38: e57-e64
        • Paravina R.D.
        • Pérez M.M.
        • Ghinea R.
        Acceptability and perceptibility thresholds in dentistry: A comprehensive review of clinical and research applications.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31: 103-112
        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Altman D.G.
        The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement.
        PLoS Med. 2009; 6: e1000097
        • Chen H.
        • Huang J.
        • Dong X.
        • Qian J.
        • He J.
        • Qu X.
        • et al.
        A systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching.
        Quintessence Int. 2012; 43: 649-659
        • The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)
        Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies (non-randomized experimental studies).
        (Available at:)
        • Brandt J.
        • Nelson S.
        • Lauer H.C.
        • von Hehn U.
        • Brandt S.
        In vivo study for tooth colour determination-visual versus digital.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21: 2863-2871
        • Yoon H.I.
        • Bae J.W.
        • Park J.M.
        • Chun Y.S.
        • Kim M.A.
        • Kim M.
        A study on possibility of clinical application for color measurements of shade guides using an intraoral digital scanner.
        J Prosthodont. 2018; 27: 670-675
        • Liberato W.F.
        • Barreto I.C.
        • Costa P.P.
        • de Almeida C.C.
        • Pimentel W.
        • Tiossi R.
        A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121: 271-275
        • Mehl A.
        • Bosch G.
        • Fischer C.
        • Ender A.
        In vivo tooth-color measurement with a new 3D intraoral scanning system in comparison to conventional digital and visual color determination methods.
        Int J Comput Dent. 2017; 20: 343-361
        • Reyes J.
        • Acosta P.
        • Ventura D.
        Repeatability of the human eye compared to an intraoral scanner in dental shade matching.
        Heliyon. 2019; 5: e02100
        • Liu Y.
        • Zhang R.
        • Ye H.
        • Wang S.
        • Wang K.P.
        • Liu Y.
        • et al.
        The development of a 3D colour reproduction system of digital impressions with an intraoral scanner and a 3D printer: a preliminary study.
        Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 20052
        • Revilla-León M.
        • Methani M.M.
        • Özcan M.
        Impact of the ambient light illuminance conditions on the shade matching capabilities of an intraoral scanner.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33: 906-912
        • Yılmaz B.
        • Irmak Ö.
        • Yaman B.C.
        Outcomes of visual tooth shade selection performed by operators with different experience.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31: 500-507
        • Rutkūnas V.
        • Dirsė J.
        • Bilius V.
        Accuracy of an intraoral digital scanner in tooth color determination.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 123: 322-329
        • Culic C.
        • Varvara M.
        • Tatar G.
        • Simu M.R.
        • Rica R.
        • Mesaros A.
        • et al.
        In vivo evaluation of teeth shade match capabilities of a dental intraoral scanner.
        Curr Health Sci J. 2018; 44: 337-341
        • Ebeid K.
        • Sabet A.
        • Della Bona A.
        Accuracy and repeatability of different intraoral scanners on shade determination.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33: 844-848
        • Hampé-Kautz V.
        • Salehi A.
        • Senger B.
        • Etienne O.
        A comparative in vivo study of new shade matching procedures.
        Int J Comput Dent. 2020; 23: 317-323
        • Czigola A.
        • Róth I.
        • Vitai V.
        • Fehér D.
        • Hermann P.
        • Borbély J.
        Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33: 1166-1174
        • Fattouh M.
        • Kenawi L.M.M.
        • Aboelela O.A.
        Repeatability of visual, spectrophotometer and intraoral scanner methods in shade matching: A comparative in-vivo study.
        Int J Dent Oral Sci. 2021; 8: 2439-2445
        • Sirintawat N.
        • Leelaratrungruang T.
        • Poovarodom P.
        • Kiattavorncharoen S.
        • Amornsettachai P.
        The accuracy and reliability of tooth shade selection using different instrumental techniques: An in vitro study.
        Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21: 7490
        • Ebeid K.
        • Sabet A.
        • El Sergany O.
        • Della Bona A.
        Accuracy and repeatability of different intraoral instruments on shade determination compared to visual shade selection.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022; 34: 988-993
        • Huang M.
        • Ye H.
        • Chen H.
        • Zhou Y.
        • Liu Y.
        • Wang Y.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of accuracy and characteristics of tooth-color matching by intraoral scanners based on Munsell color system: an in vivo study.
        Odontology. 2022; 110: 759-768