Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Digital acoustic analysis of the first three formant frequencies in patients with a prosthesis after maxillectomy

Published:November 29, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.10.010

      Abstract

      Statement of problem

      Prosthetic rehabilitation with an obturator can help to restore or improve the intelligibility of speech in patients after maxillectomy. The frequency of formants 1 and 2 as well as their ranges were initially reported in patients with maxillary defects in 2002, and the evaluation method that was used is now applied in clinical evaluation. However, the details of formant 3 are not known and warrant investigation because, according to speech science, formant 3 is related to the pharyngeal volume. Clarifying the formant frequency values of formant 3 in patients after maxillectomy would enable prosthodontists to refer to these data when planning treatment and when assessing the outcome of an obturator.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this clinical study was to determine the acoustic characteristics of formant 3, together with those of formants 1 and 2, by using a digital acoustic analysis during maxillofacial prosthetic treatment. The utility of determining formant 3 in the evaluation of speech in patients after maxillectomy was also evaluated.

      Material and methods

      Twenty-six male participants after a maxillectomy (mean age, 63 years; range, 20 to 93 years) were included, and the 5 Japanese vowels /a/, /e/, /i/, /o/, and /u/ produced with and without a definitive obturator prosthesis were recorded. The frequencies of the 3 formants were determined, and their ranges were calculated by using a speech analysis system (Computerized Speech Lab CSL 4400). The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the formants between the 2 use conditions (α=0.05).

      Results

      Significant differences were found in the frequencies and ranges of all 3 formants between the use conditions. The ranges of all 3 formants produced with the prosthesis were significantly greater than those produced without it.

      Conclusions

      Based on the findings, both the first 2 formants and the third formant were changed by wearing an obturator prosthesis. Because formant 3 is related to the volume of the pharynx, evaluation of this formant and its range can reflect the effectiveness of the prosthesis to seal the oronasal communication and help reduce hypernasality, suggesting the utility of formant 3 analysis in prosthodontic rehabilitation.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sumita Y.I.
        • Ozawa S.
        • Mukohyama H.
        • Ueno T.
        • Ohyama T.
        • Taniguchi H.
        Digital acoustic analysis of five vowels in maxillectomy patients.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29: 649-656
        • Hagio M.
        • Ishizaki K.
        • Ryu M.
        • Nomura T.
        • Takano N.
        • Sakurai K.
        Maxillofacial prosthetic treatment factors affecting oral health-related quality of life after surgery for patients with oral cancer.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 663-670
        • Morimata J.
        • Otomaru T.
        • Murase M.
        • Haraguchi M.
        • Sumita Y.
        • Taniguchi H.
        Investigation of factor affecting health-related quality of life in head and neck cancer patients.
        Gerodontology. 2013; 30: 194-200
        • Chigurupati R.
        • Aloor N.
        • Salas R.
        • Schmidt B.L.
        Quality of life after maxillectomy and prosthetic obturator rehabilitation.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 71: 1471-1478
        • Rogers S.N.
        • Lowe D.
        • Fisher S.E.
        • Brown J.S.
        • Vaughan E.D.
        Health-related quality of life and clinical function after primary surgery for oral cancer.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 40: 11-18
        • Sumita Y.I.
        • Hattori M.
        • Murase M.
        • Elbashti M.E.
        • Taniguchi H.
        Digitised evaluation of speech intelligibility using vowels in maxillectomy patients.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2018; 45: 216-221
        • Elbashti M.E.
        • Sumita Y.I.
        • Hattori M.
        • Aswehlee A.M.
        • Taniguchi H.
        Digitized speech characteristics in patients with maxillectomy defects.
        J Prosthodont. 2019; 28: 649-655
        • Chowdhury N.U.
        • Otomaru T.
        • Murase M.
        • et al.
        A new simple evaluation method of the monosyllable/sa/using a psychoacoustic system in maxillectomy patients.
        J Prosthodont Res. 2011; 55: 7-11
        • Hattori M.
        • Sumita Y.I.
        • Kimura S.
        • Taniguchi H.
        Application of an automatic conversation intelligibility test system using computerized speech recognition technique.
        J Prosthodont Res. 2010; 54: 7-13
        • Tobey E.A.
        • Lincks J.
        Acoustic analyses of speech changes after maxillectomy and prosthodontic management.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62: 449-455
        • Rieger J.
        • Wolfaardt J.
        • Seikaly H.
        • Jha N.
        Speech outcomes in patients rehabilitated with maxillary obturator prostheses after maxillectomy: a prospective study.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15: 139-144
        • Liang Y.
        • Numan A.
        • Li K.
        • Liao G.
        Spectrum analysis of Chinese vowels formant in patients with tongue carcinoma underwent hemiglossectomy.
        Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8: 2867-2873
        • Hattori M.
        • Sumita Y.I.
        • Taniguchi H.
        Measurement of voice onset time in maxillectomy patients.
        Sci World J. 2014; 2014925707
        • Prunkngarmpun C.
        • Sumita Y.I.
        • Taniguchi H.
        Three monosyllables for standard words in Nasometer test: to evaluate air leakage in maxillectomy patients.
        Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 2008; 52: 507-512
        • Umino S.
        • Masuda G.
        • Ono S.
        • Fujita K.
        Speech intelligibility following maxillectomy with and without a prosthesis: an analysis of 54 cases.
        J Oral Rehabil. 1998; 25: 153-158
        • Yoshida H.
        • Michi K.
        • Ohsawa T.
        Prosthetic treatment for speech disorders due to surgically acquired maxillary defects.
        J Oral Rehabil. 1990; 17: 565-571
        • Mahanna G.K.
        • Beukelman D.R.
        • Marshall J.A.
        • Gaebler C.A.
        • Sullivan M.
        Obturator prostheses after cancer surgery: an approach to speech outcome assessment.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 79: 310-316
        • dos Santos Barreto S.
        • Ortiz K.Z.
        Intelligibility measurements in speech disorders: a critical review of the literature.
        Pro Fono. 2008; 20: 201-206
        • Raphael L.J.
        • Borden G.J.
        • Harris K.S.
        Speech science primer: Physiology, acoustics, and perception of speech.
        6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2012
        • Johnson K.
        Acoustic and auditory phonetics.
        Wiley, Hoboken, NJ2011
        • Eckardt A.
        • Teltzrow T.
        • Schulze A.
        • Hoppe M.
        • Kuettner C.
        Nasalance in patients with maxillary defects – reconstruction versus obturation.
        J Craniomaxillofacial Surg. 2007; 35: 241-245
        • Elbashti M.E.
        • Hattori M.
        • Sumita Y.I.
        • Taniguchi H.
        Evaluation of articulation simulation system using artificial maxillectomy models.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2015; 42: 678-684
        • Inohara K.
        • Sumita Y.I.
        • Ohbayashi N.
        • et al.
        Standardization of thresholding for binary conversion of vocal tract modeling in computed tomography.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 503-509
        • Sumita Y.
        • Hattori M.
        • Inohara K.
        • Sakurai R.
        • Taniguchi H.
        Development of articulation simulation system using vocal tract model.
        in: Selected Topics on Computed Tomography. InTech, London2013: 63-70
        • Klatl D.H.
        • Klati L.C.
        Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1990; 87: 820-857
        • Lee S.
        • Potamianos A.
        • Narayanan S.
        Acoustics of children’s speech: developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1999; 105: 1455-1468
        • Deterding D.
        The formants of monophthong vowels in standard Southern British english pronunciation.
        J Int Phon Assoc. 1997; 27: 47-55
        • Fox R.A.
        Perceptual structure of monophthongs and diphthongs in english.
        Lang Speech. 1983; 26: 21-60
        • Ha J.
        • Sung I.Y.
        • Son J.H.
        • Stone M.
        • Ord R.
        • Cho Y.E.C.
        Analysis of speech and tongue motion in normal and post-glossectomy speaker using cine MRI.
        J Appl Oral Sci. 2016; 24: 472-480
        • Kent R.D.
        • Kim Y.
        Acoustic analysis of speech.
        in: The Handbook of Clinical Linguistics. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ2009: 360-380
        • Matthei E.
        • Roeper T.
        Understanding and producing speech.
        in: Universe Introductions to Linguistics. Universe Books, New York1985: 207
        • Wang Y.
        • Hattori M.
        • Garg P.
        • et al.
        Two-step fabrication of an obturator prosthesis for a large maxillary defect with digital speech analysis: a case report.
        Int J Maxillofac Prosthet. 2021; 3: 32-36