Advertisement
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Abutment removal torque and implant conical surface morphological changes after standardized artificial aging: An in vitro study

Published:December 16, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.11.016

      Abstract

      Statement of problem

      Zirconia abutments have become popular as they provide favorable esthetic outcomes. However, studies investigating how abutment material affects abutment screw torque performance and implant conical surface morphological changes in internal conical connection systems are scarce.

      Purpose

      The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the influence of abutment material on abutment removal torque and implant conical surface morphological changes in internal conical connection implant–abutment assemblies of 2 diameters after simulated long-term oral use.

      Material and methods

      Thirty abutments of 3 materials (1-piece titanium, 1-piece zirconia, zirconia with alloy base) and 2 diameters (regular, narrow) made by the original manufacturer were connected to internal conical connection implants and subjected to a standardized artificial aging process consisting of thermal cycling and mechanical cyclic loading with parameters corresponding to anterior and posterior mastication scenarios simulating long-term oral use. An abutment removal torque test was done before and after aging. Morphological changes in the implant conical contact surface were observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Initial and after-aging torque loss values were calculated and analyzed separately with 1-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc tests (α=.05).

      Results

      All specimens survived artificial aging. For initial and after-aging torque loss, the 1-piece zirconia groups showed significantly greater values (P<.001) for both diameters. In the SEM observation, the 1-piece zirconia groups showed distinct widespread surface damage while the other groups exhibited only minor damages.

      Conclusions

      Regardless of diameter, 1-piece zirconia abutments tend to induce more abutment removal torque loss and implant conical surface morphological changes than those with metal connections, both initially and after simulated long-term oral use. Zirconia abutments with an alloy base performed similarly to 1-piece titanium abutments.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Jung R.E.
        • Zembic A.
        • Pjetursson B.E.
        • Zwahlen M.
        • Thoma D.S.
        Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23 Suppl 6: 2-21
        • Chappuis V.
        • Buser R.
        • Bragger U.
        • Bornstein M.M.
        • Salvi G.E.
        • Buser D.
        Long-term outcomes of dental implants with a titanium plasma-sprayed surface: a 20-year prospective case series study in partially edentulous patients.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013; 15: 780-790
        • Papaspyridakos P.
        • Chen C.J.
        • Singh M.
        • Weber H.P.
        • Gallucci G.O.
        Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review.
        J Dent Res. 2012; 91: 242-248
        • Sadowsky S.J.
        Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? A review.
        Dent Mater. 2020; 36: 1-8
        • Ferrari M.
        • Vichi A.
        • Zarone F.
        Zirconia abutments and restorations: from laboratory to clinical investigations.
        Dent Mater. 2015; 31: e63-e76
        • Pjetursson B.E.
        • Zarauz C.
        • Strasding M.
        • Sailer I.
        • Zwahlen M.
        • Zembic A.
        A systematic review of the influence of the implant-abutment connection on the clinical outcomes of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29: 160-183
        • Sailer I.
        • Philipp A.
        • Zembic A.
        • Pjetursson B.E.
        • Hammerle C.H.
        • Zwahlen M.
        A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 4-31
        • Zembic A.
        • Kim S.
        • Zwahlen M.
        • Kelly J.R.
        Systematic review of the survival rate and incidence of biologic, technical, and esthetic complications of single implant abutments supporting fixed prostheses.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl: 99-116
        • Lops D.
        • Stellini E.
        • Sbricoli L.
        • Cea N.
        • Romeo E.
        • Bressan E.
        Influence of abutment material on peri-implant soft tissues in anterior areas with thin gingival biotype: a multicentric prospective study.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 1263-1268
        • Ma S.
        • Tawse-Smith A.
        • Brown S.D.K.
        • Duncan W.
        Immediately restored single implants in the aesthetic zone of the maxilla using a novel design: 5-year results from a prospective single-arm clinical trial.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21: 344-351
        • Sala L.
        • Bascones-Martinez A.
        • Carrillo-de-Albornoz A.
        Impact of abutment material on peri-implant soft tissue color. An in vitro study.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21: 2221-2233
        • Glauser R.
        • Sailer I.
        • Wohlwend A.
        • Studer S.
        • Schibli M.
        • Schärer P.
        Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 285-290
        • Elsayed A.
        • Wille S.
        • Al-Akhali M.
        • Kern M.
        Comparison of fracture strength and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 499-506
        • Piconi C.
        • Maccauro G.
        Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial.
        Biomaterials. 1999; 20: 1-25
        • Elsayed A.
        • Yazigi C.
        • Kern M.
        • Chaar M.S.
        Mechanical behavior of nano-hybrid composite in comparison to lithium disilicate as posterior cement-retained implant-supported crowns restoring different abutments.
        Dent Mater. 2021; 37: e435-e442
        • Elsayed A.
        • Wille S.
        • Al-Akhali M.
        • Kern M.
        Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29: 20-27
        • Sen N.
        • Us Y.O.
        Fatigue survival and failure resistance of titanium versus zirconia implant abutments with various connection designs.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 122: 315.e1-315.e7
        • Asharaf S.
        • Ali Suma K.
        • Deivanai M.
        • Mani R.
        Zirconia: properties and application – a review.
        Pak Oral Dent J. 2014; 34: 178-183
        • Nakai H.
        • Inokoshi M.
        • Nozaki K.
        • et al.
        Additively manufactured zirconia for dental applications.
        Materials (Basel). 2021; 14: 3694
        • Zhang X.
        • Wu X.
        • Shi J.
        Additive manufacturing of zirconia ceramics: a state-of-the-art review.
        J Mater Res Technol. 2020; 9: 9029-9048
        • Naveau A.
        • Rignon-Bret C.
        • Wulfman C.
        Zirconia abutments in the anterior region: a systematic review of mechanical and esthetic outcomes.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121: 775-781.e1
        • Vinhas A.S.
        • Aroso C.
        • Salazar F.
        • Lopez-Jarana P.
        • Rios-Santos J.V.
        • Herrero-Climent M.
        Review of the mechanical behavior of different implant-abutment connections.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17: 8685
        • Hess D.P.
        Preload from tightening and removal torque.
        J Fail Anal Prev. 2019; 19: 1055-1066
        • Byrne D.
        • Jacobs S.
        • O'Connell B.
        • Houston F.
        • Claffey N.
        Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
        J Prosthodont. 2006; 15: 164-171
        • Martin W.C.
        • Woody R.D.
        • Miller B.H.
        • Miller A.W.
        Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86: 24-32
        • Park J.K.
        • Choi J.U.
        • Jeon Y.C.
        • Choi K.S.
        • Jeong C.M.
        Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload.
        J Prosthodont. 2010; 19: 458-464
        • Zipprich H.
        • Rathe F.
        • Pinz S.
        • Schlotmann L.
        • Lauer H.C.
        • Ratka C.
        Effects of screw configuration on the preload force of implant-abutment screws.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018; 33: e25-e32
        • Huang Y.
        • Wang J.
        Mechanism of and factors associated with the loosening of the implant abutment screw: a review.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31: 338-345
        • Khraisat A.
        • Abu-Hammad O.
        • Dar-Odeh N.
        • Al-Kayed A.M.
        Abutment screw loosening and bending resistance of external hexagon implant system after lateral cyclic loading.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004; 6: 157-164
        • Sammour S.R.
        • Maamoun El-Sheikh M.
        • Aly El-Gendy A.
        Effect of implant abutment connection designs, and implant diameters on screw loosening before and after cyclic loading: in-vitro study.
        Dent Mater. 2019; 35: e265-e271
        • Ozcan M.
        • Melo R.M.
        • Souza R.O.
        • Machado J.P.
        • Felipe Valandro L.
        • Botttino M.A.
        Effect of air-particle abrasion protocols on the biaxial flexural strength, surface characteristics and phase transformation of zirconia after cyclic loading.
        J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013; 20: 19-28
        • Sikora C.L.
        • Alfaro M.F.
        • Yuan J.C.
        • Barao V.A.
        • Sukotjo C.
        • Mathew M.T.
        Wear and corrosion interactions at the titanium/zirconia interface: dental implant application.
        J Prosthodont. 2018; 27: 842-852
        • Klotz M.W.
        • Taylor T.D.
        • Goldberg A.J.
        Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26: 970-975
        • Nam R.K.
        • Lee S.J.
        • Park E.J.
        • Kwon H.B.
        • Yoon H.I.
        Three-dimensional deformation and wear of internal implant-abutment connection: a comparative biomechanical study using titanium and zirconia.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018; 33: 1279-1286
        • Stimmelmayr M.
        • Edelhoff D.
        • Guth J.F.
        • Erdelt K.
        • Happe A.
        • Beuer F.
        Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.
        Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 1215-1220
        • Pereira P.H.S.
        • Amaral M.
        • Baroudi K.
        • Vitti R.P.
        • Nassani M.Z.
        • Silva-Concilio L.R.D.
        Effect of implant platform connection and abutment material on removal torque and implant hexagon plastic deformation.
        Eur J Dent. 2019; 13: 349-353
        • Bickford J.H.
        4th ed. Introduction to the design and behavior of bolted joints: non-gasketed joints. Vol. 297. CRC Press, Florida2007
        • Gehrke P.
        • Johannson D.
        • Fischer C.
        • Stawarczyk B.
        • Beuer F.
        In vitro fatigue and fracture resistance of one- and two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30: 546-554
        • Vechiato-Filho A.J.
        • Pesqueira A.A.
        • De Souza G.M.
        • dos Santos D.M.
        • Pellizzer E.P.
        • Goiato M.C.
        Are zirconia implant abutments safe and predictable in posterior regions? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2016; 29: 233-244
        • Mishra S.K.
        • Chowdhary R.
        • Kumari S.
        Microleakage at the different implant abutment interface: a systematic review.
        J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11: ZE10-ZE15
        • Butignon L.E.
        • Basilio M.D.A.
        • Pereira R.D.P.
        • Arioli Filho J.N.
        Influence of three types of abutments on preload values before and after cyclic loading with structural analysis by scanning electron microscopy.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28: e161-e170
        • Jorge J.R.
        • Barao V.A.
        • Delben J.A.
        • Assuncao W.G.
        The role of implant/abutment system on torque maintenance of retention screws and vertical misfit of implant-supported crowns before and after mechanical cycling.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28: 415-422
        • Nakano R.
        • Homma S.
        • Takanashi T.
        • Hirano T.
        • Furuya Y.
        • Yajima Y.
        Influence of eccentric cyclic loading on implant components: comparison between titanium and zirconia abutments.
        Dent Mater J. 2021; 40: 235-244
        • Pintinha M.
        • Camarini E.T.
        • Sabio S.
        • Pereira J.R.
        Effect of mechanical loading on the removal torque of different types of tapered connection abutments for dental implants.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 110: 383-388
        • Yi Y.
        • Heo S.J.
        • Koak J.Y.
        • Kim S.K.
        Comparison of CAD/CAM abutment and prefabricated abutment in Morse taper internal type implant after cyclic loading: axial displacement, removal torque, and tensile removal force.
        J Adv Prosthodont. 2019; 11: 305-312
        • Gou M.
        • Chen H.
        • Fu M.
        • Wang H.
        Fracture of zirconia abutments in implant treatments: a systematic review.
        Implant Dent. 2019; 28: 378-387
        • Sailer I.
        • Asgeirsson A.G.
        • Thoma D.S.
        • et al.
        Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: a study on the titanium resin base concept.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29: 411-423
        • Rojo R.
        • Prados-Privado M.
        • Reinoso A.
        • Prados-Frutos J.
        Evaluation of fatigue behavior in dental implants from in vitro clinical tests: a systematic review.
        Metals. 2018; 8: 313
        • Coray R.
        • Zeltner M.
        • Ozcan M.
        Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.
        J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016; 62: 333-346
        • Nilsson A.
        • Johansson L.-Å.
        • Lindh C.
        • Ekfeldt A.
        One-piece internal zirconia abutments for single-tooth restorations on narrow and regular diameter implants: a 5-year prospective follow-up study.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19: 916-925
        • Kim K.S.
        • Lim Y.J.
        • Kim M.J.
        • et al.
        Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22: 834-839
        • Rosentritt M.
        • Behr M.
        • van der Zel J.M.
        • Feilzer A.J.
        Approach for evaluating the influence of laboratory simulation.
        Dent Mater. 2009; 25: 348-352
        • Ferrario V.F.
        • Sforza C.
        • Serrao G.
        • Dellavia C.
        • Tartaglia G.M.
        Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31: 18-22
        • Fontijn-Tekamp F.A.
        • Slagter A.P.
        • Van Der Bilt A.
        • et al.
        Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions.
        J Dent Res. 2000; 79: 1519-1524
        • Padma S.
        • Umesh S.
        • Asokan S.
        • Srinivas T.
        Bite force measurement based on fiber Bragg grating sensor.
        J Biomed Opt. 2017; 22: 1-6
        • Helkimo E.
        • Carlsson G.E.
        • Helkimo M.
        Bite force and state of dentition.
        Acta Odontol Scand. 1977; 35: 297-303
        • International Organization for Standardization
        ISO 14801:2016 Dentistry — implants — dynamic loading test for endosseous dental implants.
        International Organization for Standardization, Geneva2016: 4