Abstract
A straightforward and effective restorative option is proposed for implant-supported
fixed prostheses with external connections by using monolithic zirconia without the
interposition of a Ti-base component. The technique is based on a modification of
the Brånemark connection used to link metal-ceramic or metal-composite resin restorations
directly to the implant.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic DentistryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Long-term follow-up of turned single implants placed in periodontally healthy patients after 16-22 years: radiographic and peri-implant outcome.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23: 197-204
- Long-term follow-up of CeraOne™ single-implant restorations: an 18-year follow-up study based on a prospective patient cohort.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14: 471-479
- Single implants in the anterior maxilla after 15 years of follow-up: comparison with central implants in the edentulous maxilla.Int J Prosthodont. 2008; 21: 400-408
- The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 20: 653-664
- Bacterial Microleakage at the Implant-Abutment Interface: an In Vitro Study.Bioengineering (Basel). 2022; 9: 277
- Influences of microgap and micromotion of implant-abutment interface on marginal bone loss around implant neck.Arch Oral Biol. 2017; 83: 153-160
- Platform switching technique and crestal bone loss around the dental implants: a systematic review.Ann Afr Med. 2019; 18: 1-6
- Microbiological assessment of the implant-abutment interface in different connections: cross-sectional study after 5 years of functional loading.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 426-434
- Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85: 599-607
- A 3-D finite element analysis of stress distribution on implant-supported fixed prosthesis with four different commercially available implant systems.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020; 21: 835-840
- Comparison of external, internal flat-to-flat, and conical implant abutment connections for implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.J Prosthet Dent. 11 November 2021; ([Epub ahead of print.])https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.029
- Mechanical behavior of titanium and zirconia abutments at the implant-abutment interface: a systematic review.J Prosthet Dent. 12 March 2022; ([Epub ahead of print.])https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.006
- Biomechanical evaluation of different implant-abutment connections, retention systems, and restorative materials in the implant-supported single crowns using 3d finite element analysis.J Oral Implantol. 2022; 48: 194-201
- Aging resistance, mechanical properties and translucency of different yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics for monolithic dental crown applications.Dent Mater. 2018; 34: 879-890
- Evaluation of the biological behaviour of various dental implant abutment materials on attachment and viability of human gingival fibroblasts.Dent Mater. 2019; 35: 1053-1063
- Zirconia-Based Screw-Retained Prostheses Supported by Implants: a Retrospective Study on Technical Complications and Failures.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17: 1073-1081
- Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 74-81
- Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23: 12-18
- In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 850-858
- A pilot study of joint stability at the zirconium or titanium abutment/titanium implant interface.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29: 338-343
- Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22: 928-938
Klotz MW, Taylor TD, Goldberg AJ. Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants;26:970–975.
- Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.Dent Mater. 2011; 28: 1215-1220
- The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008; 10: 113-121
- Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw-retained zirconia-based molar restorations.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 1119-1126
- Eleven-Year Follow-Up of a prospective study of zirconia implant abutments supporting single all-ceramic crowns in anterior and premolar regions.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17: 417-426
- Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 384-390
- The effect of zirconia or titanium as abutment material on soft peri-implant tissues: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 139-147
- An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications.J Dent. 2007; 35: 81926
- Effect of implant platform connection and abutment material on removal torque and implant hexagon plastic deformation.Eur J Dent. 2019; 13: 349-353
- Effect of Crown Height on the Screw Stability of Titanium Screw-Retained Crowns.J Prosthodont. 2021; 30: 515-519
Article info
Publication history
Published online: March 08, 2023
Publication stage
In Press Corrected ProofIdentification
Copyright
© 2023 by the Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
