Statement of problem
Mastication forces in different regions affect the survival of multiunit posterior restorations. The fracture strength of 3-unit posterior monolithic zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and their fracture patterns require investigation.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the fracture strength and fracture pattern of 3-unit posterior FPDs fabricated from different monolithic zirconia materials.
Material and methods
Thirty 3-unit FPDs were fabricated from BruxZir, FireZr, and Upcera (n=10 per group). Energy-dispersive spectroscopy analysis was performed on 2 selected specimens from each group. All specimens were exposed to a mastication simulator for 1.2×106 cycles and then monotonically loaded to fracture at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The surfaces of a selected fractured specimen were examined at magnifications of ×25 and ×500 with scanning electron microscopy. Conformity to normal distribution was evaluated with the Shapiro-Wilk test. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the normally distributed initial crack formation load F initial (Fi) and catastrophic failure strength F maximum (Fm) means by group. Weibull statistics were calculated by using the maximum likelihood estimation method. The chi-square test was used to compare shape and scale parameters (α=.05).
The mean Fm values were fail1878.9 N for Upcera, 2177.8 N for BruxZir, and 2229.4 N for FireZr. Upcera and BruxZir showed statistically significant differences for the Fm mean values (P=.039). The differences between the fracture type distributions according to the groups were statistically similar (P>.05). For Fi, Upcera presented the highest Weibull modulus value (2.199), FireZr had the lowest (1.594), while for Fm, BruxZir had the highest Weibull modulus value (9.267) and FireZr the lowest (6.572).
Using the zirconia materials BruxZir, FireZr, and Upcera resulted in high Fm values after aging procedures. With all materials, the fractures were most commonly found in the connector areas in the tested FPDs.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Zirconia ceramic fixed partial dentures after cyclic fatigue tests and clinical evaluation: a systematic review.Adv Appl Ceram. 2019; 118: 62-69
- Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature.J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92: 557-562
- The effect of mechanical fatigue and accelerated ageing on fracture resistance of glazed monolithic zirconia dental bridges.J Eur Ceram Soc. 2017; 37: 4415-4422
- All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: single crowns (SCs).Dent Mater. 2015; 31: 603-623
- In vitro failure and fracture resistance of veneered and full-contour zirconia restorations.J Dent. 2012; 40: 921-928
- Complete and partial contour zirconia designs for crowns and fixed dental prostheses: a clinical report.J Prosthet Dent. 2011; 106: 145-152
- Clinical performance and failures of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures: a review literature.J Adv Prosthodont. 2012; 4: 76-83
- Marginal discrepancy and load to fracture of monolithic zirconia laminate veneers: the effect of preparation design and sintering protocol.Dent Mater J. 2021; 40: 331-338
- Effect of stress-induced phase transformation on the properties of polycrystalline zirconia containing metastable tetragonal phase.J Mater Sci. 1978; 13: 1464-1470
- Strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge.Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020; 56: 1-23
- The influence of low-temperature degradation and cyclic loading on the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015; 47: 49-56
- Critical considerations on load-to-failure test for monolithic zirconia molar crowns.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018; 87: 180-189
- Monolithic zirconia: a review of the literature.Biomed Res. 2016; 27: 1427-1436
- An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry.Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2016; 30: 644-652
- Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial.Biomaterials. 1999; 20: 1-25
- Fracture resistance of all-ceramic zirconia bridges with differing phase stabilizers and quality of sintering.Dent Mater. 2006; 22: 778-784
- Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics.Dent Mater. 2004; 20: 449-456
- Low temperature degradation -aging- of zirconia: a critical review of the relevant aspects in dentistry.Dent Mater. 2010; 26: 807-820
- In vitro evaluation of low-temperature aging effects and finishing procedures on the flexural strength and structural stability of Y-TZP dental ceramics.J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 96: 154-164
- Fracture strength of aged monolithic and bilayer zirconia-based crowns.Biomed Res Int. 2015; 15: 7
- Effect of mastication simulation on the phase transformation of posterior 3-unit monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses.J Prosthet Dent. 2021; 126: 794
- Effect of two brands of glaze material on the flexural strength and probability of failure of high translucent monolithic zirconia.Materials. 2021; 14: 7022
- The effect of in vitro aging and fatigue on the flexural strength of monolithic high-translucency zirconia restorations.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018; 19: 867-873
- Influence of aging on flexural strength of translucent zirconia for monolithic restorations.J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 303-309
- Influence of the yttrium content on the fracture strength of monolithic zirconia crowns after artificial aging.Quintessence Int. 2019; 50: 344-348
- Biaxial flexural strength of different types of monolithic zirconia.Brazilian Dent Sci. 2019; 22: 118-123
- A practical and systematic review of Weibull statistics for reporting strengths of dental materials.Dent Mater. 2010; 26: 135-147
- Influence of the supporting die structures on the fracture strength of all-ceramic materials.Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16: 1105-1110
- Fracture of layered zirconia restorations at 5 years: A dental laboratory survey.J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 118: 353-356
- Multilayer zirconia: influence of positioning within blank and sintering conditions on the in vitro performance of 3-unit fixed partial dentures.J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 127: 141-145
- Effects of two grading techniques of zirconia material on the fatigue limit of full-contour 3-unit fixed dental prostheses.Dent Mater. 2017; 33: 155-164
- Analysis of tooth enamel after excessive bleaching: a study using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy.Int J Prosthodont. 2010; 23: 29-32
- ATR-FTIR, EDS and SEM evaluations of enamel structure after treatment with hydrogen peroxide bleaching agents loaded with nano-hydroxyapatite particles.PeerJ. 2021; 9: 10606
- High-frequency induction heat sintering of mechanically alloyed alumina–yttria-stabilized zirconia nano-bioceramics.J Am Ceram Soc. 2006; 89: 1280-1285
Published online: April 04, 2023
© 2023 by the Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.