Editorial| Volume 80, ISSUE 6, P639-640, December 1998

Download started.


Editorial: Towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants

      Five simple tools—the lever, wedge, wheel and axle, pulley and screw—have existed for millennia. Each of these tools and their underlying principles have been refined, improved and combined in various ways to produce other tools and engineering principles (no longer simple), which in turn have revolutionized the application of modern dental techniques. This process has been particularly important in the disciplines of surgery and prosthodontics. Archimedes, in the third century BC, understood the operation of the mechanical screw, which represents a basic tenet of endosseous stabilization, albeit limited in its time and biologically-dependent efficacy and effectiveness.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Brånemark PI
        • Hansson BO
        • Adel R
        • Breine U
        • Lindstrom J
        • Hallen O
        • Ohman A.
        Osseointegrated implant in the treatment of the edentulous jaw—Experience from a ten-year period.
        (Monograph) : Almquist and Wiksell, Stockholm1977
        • US Department of Health and Human Services
        Dental implants: benefit and risk. An HIH-Harvard Consensus Development Conference.
        (US Department of Health and Human Services)December 1980
        • Albrektsson T
        • Zarb GA
        • Worthington P
        • Eriksson AR.
        The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1: 11-25
        • Smith DE
        • Zarb GA.
        Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62: 567-572
        • Albrektsson R
        • Zarb GA.
        Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance.
        Int J Prosthodont. 1993; 6: 95-105